IIZaadz Blogopalooza - Monday

Personal Perspectives from an Integral Worldspace

(or... what I consider to be important shit right now)


Shadow work

Any part of the psyche's I-stream can be severed from our self-identity and be either repressed, projected, dissociated or in some other way hidden from ourselves. The cut-off parts are usually unconscious and hence referred to as Shadow. Normally we tend to think that Shadow is a bad thing and something that needs to be fixed ASAP. While it is definitely true in my book that Shadow work and reintegration of lost parts of the psyche are some of the most important spiritual practices there are, let us also remember that our ability to form Shadow is a gift without which human societies wouldn't be able to function.

Growing up, our life in general and our families in particular (or lack thereof) expose us to a series of mini-traumas and possibly bigger ones as well. The ability to form Shadow in these situations is what keeps us sane and enables us to keep on growing cognitively, value-wise, in our sense of self, etc. As children we still don't have the ability to change our life circumstances, nor do we know how to sublimate or use other more mature strategies to deal with life's hardships. To a certain extent (ie in at least some lines of development) this can be true throughout people's lives, which makes the ability to form shadow an important and natural part of being human.

Even though it's a gift to be able to form shadow, it is just as important to be willing to deal with it when more favorable conditions return. As Integralites we climb higher up the spiral than most, and this makes it especially important to face disowned parts of ourselves. High towers need strong foundations to stay in place... It's also important to remember that the higher up the spiral we go the greater our ability to affect other people, and large amounts of unprocessed shadow will make us about as responsible as Darth Vader.

So how do we integrate lost parts of ourselves? First let me say that I do not include psychosis and PTSD in the concept of Shadow, these are distinct disorders and need different approaches. The Shadow work I want to promote in this essay is psychotherapy, even though there certainly are other valid practices. The second person perspective that a trained therapist can bring to the table is invaluable, considering that our deepest projections and repressions are very hard to spot on our own. Furthermore a therapist can provide a cocoon of unconditional acceptance that eases the knots of anxiety that usually keep repressed/projected parts in place. In a way I believe that seeing a trained therapist is extra important for people with high cognitive development, such as Integralites. Amidst our brilliance regarding meditation, books, yoga and frameworks it can all too easily be tempting to want to bypass good old-fashioned terapia, I certainly know that I did for a long time...

Some of the more common therapies include psychodynamics, cognitive-behavioral, Gestalt, dialectical behavioral therapy, transactional analysis, body psychotherapy, and many more.


Framework

How do we think about ourselves, our lives, Kosmos itself and where we are going? All of this is largely determined by the framework we consciously or not so consciously ascribe to. At integral levels of consciousness Ken Wilber and his AQAL framework is the best known and as far as I know most complete framework. Having some intimate knowledge of his latest model Wilber-5 is invaluable to any person with an integral cognition. It is of great value for quickly and effectively communicating with another person who knows of the framework, and it has great potential as a tool to bring different branches of science together, just to mention a couple of its uses. Once you "download" the AQAL framework to your mind it is there in the background for you to draw upon as needed.

A potential problem with AQAL is that it is so all-encompassing that you might think it's the only framework you'll ever need. Another trap many of us tend to fall into regularly is confusing the content-less AQAL structures with Ken's own opinions on a variety of subjects (effectively making him both judge and jury, though he never asked for those positions). A third pitfall is getting stuck in your head juggling concepts, instead of exploring actual territory with your own raw Integral consciousness. An effective antidote to address these three traps is getting familiar with other Integral frameworks and thinkers.

Susanne Cook-Greuter for example has some vivid, alive and yet scientific descriptions of Ego Development that add some much needed meat to the dry bones of AQAL levels. Robert Augustus Masters, a k a RAM, is an Integral Therapist who in his texts repeatedly displays a grounded Integral consciousness while remaining fluid in thought, body and spirit. To me it is apparent that there is deep value in freely expressing interior Integral worldspaces without automatically being restricted by AQAL, and in my book RAM is one of the best examples of this.

To be effective in one's daily life I believe in having a framework that is not strictly related to different stages of consciousness. AQAL is great to have in the background to make sure most bases are covered, but it is not exactly juicy nor does it inspire me to take action. NLP on the other hand is a much better example of an action-oriented framework focused on results. One of its simplest techniques is focusing on what you want versus focusing on what you don't want, and this is a key concept for everyone wanting to be effective. Human creativity is sparked by the images, thoughts and feelings we carry around; so intentionally focusing on what we want will automatically give us a stream of ideas on how to achieve it. This also connects to the importance of Shadow work, since we will naturally focus on positive goals/dreams instead of negative fears as the death grip of the Shadow subsides. Whether strong human intentions can sometimes translate into non-local communication between humans, and thereby also aid us in pursuing our highest purpose, is a controversial topic in the Integral movement and I will therefore let it rest for now. For the purposes of this discussion it doesn't even matter since a clear focus and strong intentions are still needed to put your brain and creativity to work for you.

Other interesting NLP concepts are Presuppositions (here and here), Representational Systems (a type model), Meta Programs and Reframing.



The Masculine and The Feminine

You can call them types, energies, polarities, modes of being or any number of terms. Throughout history man- and womankind have been fascinated with the Kosmic play between the masculine and the feminine. Integral is the the first stage of development where we have access to a worldspace wide and resilient enough to start investigating and integrating these two energies in a deeper way.

On a group level men clearly have a predominance of masculine energies and women of feminine ones, but individually it may vary. Important to remember is also that every individual possesses both, and therefore must make peace with each side of the spectrum and somehow find a way to work with both in spiritual practice.

Besides making the distinction between the masculine and the feminine, I distinguish between the intellectual, the interpersonal and the spiritual. This leads to six different combinations: the intellectual masculine, the intellectual feminine, the interpersonal masculine, the interpersonal feminine, the spiritual masculine and the spiritual feminine. It is my hope that fleshing it out this way will be of practical value, and not only an exercise in theory.

The intellectual masculine means having the agency and guts to flesh out your own ideas as clearly as possible, and also daring to disagree with others if you don't feel that their ideas hold up to scrutiny. It all takes place in the world of concept and ideas, and the intellectual masculine is usually thriving on Integral forums such as the I-I pod and the Multiplex forums.

The intellectual feminine is less preoccupied with structures, framework and agentically challenging others' ideas. Instead it wants to engage intuitive and messy ideas that it feels doesn't get, and might never get, addressed by ever-expanding frameworks from the intellectual masculine. Instead of wanting to challenge other people's ideas, it simply wants to be heard and hear others sharing their ideas.

The interpersonal masculine is an outward force that is striving to help others acheive agency. A core example is lovingly challenging someone else to grow, or challenging them to own something they appear to resist. This could be when somebody openly claims to have a certain shadow, but behaves in quite the opposite way - to take one obvious example. It can also be in the form of asking a tough penetrating question, and that of course has the advantage of letting the other person choose how deep he/she wants to go in the growth process. Fatherly tough love also falls into the category of the interpersonal masculine.

The interpersonal feminine wants to unconditionally embrace people, no matter how messy the situation is or how much a person has fucked up and gone against the good, true and beautiful. It doesn't consciously challenge another person to grow, but can still induce growth by increasing self-acceptance.

The spiritual masculine is addressed rather often in the Integral movement. Key points include the striving for freedom and transcendence, for example through sitting meditation. In some ways it is a "clean" and ascending spirituality that aims to transcend the messiness of lower levels. It is impersonal and ultimately looks for unity with the creative impulse of Spirit itself.

The spiritual feminine is also increasingly addressed among integralites. The focus here is more on bringing spirit down to lower levels, and embracing more and more in ever-expanding circles of love. Embodiment is a key feature, as are engaging paradoxes and trusting intuition. Spiritual dancing is a common example, but there are also forms of meditation that lean towards the feminine.

Ultimately all six categories represent different ways of approaching God and approaching Love.

The Missing Links of the Wilber-Coombs Lattice

One of the important concepts of Wilber-5 is the difference between horizontal and vertical enlightenment. The first one means state training until you reach a non-dual plateau, since that is the "highest" state known, and the second one means transcending and including relative realm stages until you are at the leading edge of the evolution of consciousness. The two concepts make a lot of sense and do clear up a lot of confusion around the issue of enlightenment. At the same time they raise a new set of questions...

Regarding vertical enlightenment, exactly what lines of development need to be at the leading edge? Cognition? Values? Who gets to decide what lines of development need to be at the leading edge to have achieved vertical enlightenment? It seems to be at best a moving target... Horizontal enlightenment on the other hand, seems to be more easily defined, as long as we can assume that there is only one horizontal line. The problem that arises here is instead that even a non-dual state plateau does in no way guarantee good health of the bodies that have been transcended, ie gross, subtle and causal. In the gross realm we give Shadow and levels their due attention - but why not extend the same courtesy to at least the subtle body?

I am a firm believer that vertical development of the subtle body exists; one example is the development of each chakra through different stages. We also find Shadows in the subtle realm, and these are often spoken of as blockages in the energy flow. Furthermore it is quite possible to speak of the horizontal health within a certain level of development of the subtle energy body (ie healthy translation). Finally we have the current state of the subtle body or of an individual chakra, and this seems to be the most common way of addressing the health of this energy body - but obviously this is an oversimplification.

Spiritual Bypass vs Genuine Spiritual Gains

Steve Pavlina and his subjective reality perspective on VA Tech seems to be an endless source of controversy and debate, spawned by a blog entry of his. Many people in the Integral movement felt he was championing a dissociative approach in this blog post, and not accepting the suffering of samsara. I want to state my position on these questions briefly but clearly.

Pain cannot be escaped. Loss cannot be escaped. Emotions cannot be escaped. These are intrinsic parts of human beings in 3D reality.

However, our relationship to pain, loss and emotions can be modified in at least two general ways. First of all Ego Development as well as healthy translation can make us more complex and resilient as individuals. This leads to the ability to feel pain more fully in the moment and hence process it more quickly and more thoroughly. Secondly, horizontal spiritual development through meditation and other state training techniques lessens our exclusive identification with the gross realm. This does not make pain go away, but it can make suffering as a consequence of pain all but disappear.


New Age

This is another point of controversy and a pet peeve for lots of Integral debaters. I personally believe New Age to have both healthy and unhealthy green spirituality hidden inside of it. The healthy parts include love, hands-on healing, community, treating people well, reconnecting to spirituality after losing touch within the orange worldspace. Unhealthy parts include magical thinking, not wanting to look at one's dark parts (Shadow!), not wanting to do any uncomfortable work at all, not being able to distinguish compassion from idiot compassion.

The healthy parts have their given place as partial truths within an Integral worldspace. The unhealthy parts need to be addressed by integralites, but lovingly as well as firmly, so as not to alienate those who are struggling to find a spiritual path in their life. Didn't we all use to be green at some point in our life? Can we find compassion for those we were and for our current internalized green selves? If we can, I think it will be much easier not to attack green but instead gently point out its inconsistencies and carefully explain to its followers how a more Integral approach could be of benefit.

peace and blessings
pelle